Reviews of Philosophy of Medicine

So far, I’ve seen three reviews, two positive, one negative:

Shane Glackin in BJPS writes: ‘Rarely can a single book have so crystallized and advanced an entirely new agenda for a field that had no idea it needed it.’ http://www.thebsps.org/2019/10/glackinonbroadbent/

The New Books Network writes: ‘An accessible and user-friendly guide, Philosophy of Medicine puts these different debates into perspective and identifies areas that demand further exploration.’ https://newbooksnetwork.com/alex-broadbent-philosophy-of-medicine-oxford-up-2019/

On the other hand, Donald Gillies in Metascience writes: ‘He puts forward quite a number of novel theses, but the present reviewer finds most of these rather implausible.’ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11016-019-00463-5

A Marmite book?…

marmite.jpg

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s