Reviews of Philosophy of Medicine

So far, I’ve seen three reviews, two positive, one negative:

Shane Glackin in BJPS writes: ‘Rarely can a single book have so crystallized and advanced an entirely new agenda for a field that had no idea it needed it.’

The New Books Network writes: ‘An accessible and user-friendly guide, Philosophy of Medicine puts these different debates into perspective and identifies areas that demand further exploration.’

On the other hand, Donald Gillies in Metascience writes: ‘He puts forward quite a number of novel theses, but the present reviewer finds most of these rather implausible.’

A Marmite book?…